oh for the days when the women wore stockings...
Gah. Those first few 1985 pages feature some of the ugliest underwear models I've ever seen. The hair isn't helping.Oh my! Bottom-right of the last 1986 page. Great looking panties and little pointy bra! Pointy bras are the best.
I have some of these sets, or their modern equivalent.Some are not "practical," but that is not why I wear them. Nor do I wear them all the time.
Great post! fantastic!!!@ Armipit Studios: Pardon me, perhaps you meant “pubic hair”? :-)In fact, what I like of the first 1985 ad, is exactly that you can see some hint of the models’ pubic hair through the sheer fabric of their panties/body suit.Sadly, pubic hair have been completely banned from the lingerie ads starting from the late 90’s on...On today’s lingerie ads, female models look like sexless, which is a nonsense (and unfair, if you consider that male models usually sport a considerable hardon under their pants).BTW: you can guess some hair also on 1985 #2, 1986 #6 and 7, 1989 #1, 1991 #1 and 1992 #2.But the most visible is that of the model on the left, in 1988 #1 - It’s a pity she wears an ugly fluo lipstick.It is also remarkable the “suspender-under-panties” shown by model on 1985 #1 (that is how suspenders should be worn! or not? ;-)GP
No, the horrible hair on their head distracts from any redeeming quality that might be down below.