@ Armipit Studios: Pardon me, perhaps you meant “pubic hair”? :-) In fact, what I like of the first 1985 ad, is exactly that you can see some hint of the models’ pubic hair through the sheer fabric of their panties/body suit.
Sadly, pubic hair have been completely banned from the lingerie ads starting from the late 90’s on... On today’s lingerie ads, female models look like sexless, which is a nonsense (and unfair, if you consider that male models usually sport a considerable hardon under their pants).
BTW: you can guess some hair also on 1985 #2, 1986 #6 and 7, 1989 #1, 1991 #1 and 1992 #2. But the most visible is that of the model on the left, in 1988 #1 - It’s a pity she wears an ugly fluo lipstick. It is also remarkable the “suspender-under-panties” shown by model on 1985 #1 (that is how suspenders should be worn! or not? ;-)
oh for the days when the women wore stockings...
ReplyDeleteGah. Those first few 1985 pages feature some of the ugliest underwear models I've ever seen. The hair isn't helping.
ReplyDeleteOh my! Bottom-right of the last 1986 page. Great looking panties and little pointy bra! Pointy bras are the best.
I have some of these sets, or their modern equivalent.
ReplyDeleteSome are not "practical," but that is not why I wear them.
Nor do I wear them all the time.
Great post! fantastic!!!
ReplyDelete@ Armipit Studios: Pardon me, perhaps you meant “pubic hair”? :-)
In fact, what I like of the first 1985 ad, is exactly that you can see some hint of the models’ pubic hair through the sheer fabric of their panties/body suit.
Sadly, pubic hair have been completely banned from the lingerie ads starting from the late 90’s on...
On today’s lingerie ads, female models look like sexless, which is a nonsense (and unfair, if you consider that male models usually sport a considerable hardon under their pants).
BTW: you can guess some hair also on 1985 #2, 1986 #6 and 7, 1989 #1, 1991 #1 and 1992 #2.
But the most visible is that of the model on the left, in 1988 #1 - It’s a pity she wears an ugly fluo lipstick.
It is also remarkable the “suspender-under-panties” shown by model on 1985 #1 (that is how suspenders should be worn! or not? ;-)
GP
No, the horrible hair on their head distracts from any redeeming quality that might be down below.
DeleteWhat a great site!
ReplyDelete